by Eric Berglund (not verified) - 09/03/2009 - 20:36
The problem with "average sales price" data is that when sales of houses at one of the market dominate the stats, they drag the average in their direction. I think the foreclosures and short sales in the last year skewed the stats too dramatically downward. As a result, as the higher end of the market unfreezes, the upward numbers are going to look overly dramatic as well.
Chris's stat of 11x price-to-median is really crazy. Of course, Vancouver is a great city, and most Canadians would call it their favorite. I'm sure it attracts the wealthy retirees and second-home-owning Canadians. But 11x? (3x or maybe 4x is more typical...the Bay Area got up to 6x.) Are the development rules really restrictive?
The problem with "average